Electricity evidence
- Subject
- Synthetic example · Beiling assembly plant (SITE-N1)
- Period
- 2025-01-01 – 2025-06-30
- Data version
- Usage summary v1 · compiled 2025-07-14
Open a usage figure, read the notice it comes from, compare the original notice with the reissued correction, and see which cited notice was never supplied.
Figures
| Item | Value | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly usage | ||
| 352,800 kWh | ||
| 298,400 kWh | ||
| 331,500 kWh | ||
| 348,200 kWh | ||
| 364,900 kWh | ||
| 365,500 kWh | ||
| Period total | ||
| 2,061,300 kWhValue stated in source | ||
Select a row to see what it cites.
Reference status
What the current selection cites, and what is outstanding. It follows the selection directly. This scenario reports references: it runs no check, produces no outcome, and clears nothing for release.
Missing documents (1)
- March 2025 electricity notice — Named by the summary as not obtained. No file, no page, nothing to quote.
Outstanding citations (1)
- March 2025 — 1 of 2 citations in the evidence set
- March 2025 electricity notice · Not supplied
Documents with a later revision
- April 2025 — This document has a later revision than the one this row cites.
Scope of this scenario
- Every document in this scenario is synthetic. It is not customer data and not a field record.
- This view shows what the documents state and what cites what. It builds no emissions model and makes no ESG-compliance judgement.
- The period total is the value stated in the summary. Nothing on this screen recomputes it.
- The money-Closure outcomes of the drawdown scenario are not carried across to a quantity.
Technical details
- Synthetic fixture
- electricity-usage-v1
- Published source files
- /sources/electricity-usage-v1/